IODP-MSP drilling and logging contractor: ESO

Hole: M0029A

Expedition: 313

Location: New Jersey (NW Atlantic)

Latitude: 39° 31.1605 N

Longitude: 73° 24.7925 W

Logging date: July 11 - 16, 2009

Sea floor depth (driller's): 53.41 m DRF

Sea floor depth (logger's): 53.26 m WRF

Total penetration: 754.55 m DSF

Total core recovered:  454.31 m (74.55 % of cored section)

Oldest sediment recovered: Early Miocene

Lithologies: Clays to gravels

 

 

 

Date

Top depth (m WSF)

Bottom depth

(m WSF)

Spacing

(m)

Open hole survey

(m WSF)

Through pipe survey (m WSF)

11-Jul-09

753.42

207.83

3.05

n/a

0-753

14-Jul-09

226.12

12.76

3.05

n/a

0-226

 

VSP survey data was acquired in two stages in M0029A due to a lightning storm halting operations on the first run around 200 m from the top of the borehole. All data was acquired through pipe in this hole. For M0029A it was necessary to apply F-K and bandpass filters prior to picking seismic arrivals through the sediment for survey “a”.   An F-K filter and AGC (automatic gain control) was applied prior to picking sediment arrival times on survey “b”. The F-K filters were designed to remove all upgoing waves and downgoing waves traveling with velocities over ~3000 m/s.  These filters were not saved in order to preserve the information within the data for further research.  Interference from seismic arrivals through steel meant that despite processing, the only consistent first break from survey “a” was a peak, while in survey “b”, where this interference did not exist, the first break picked was a trough.

 

For M0029A the suspended hydrophone and its known distance from the airgun source was used to determine the firing time of the airgun, and from this the stacked data was shifted to reflect the airgun firing at time zero.  The peaks observed on the hydrophone records were picked for this purpose.  First breaks (peaks) were also picked for the seafloor geophone and used to determine the traveltime through the water column.  The ROV was dispatched for both surveys on this hole to assess the location of the seafloor hydro/geophone.  In both cases there was estimated to be a maximum 5 m horizontal offset between the top of the cable where it came onto the ship and the bottom of the cable where it connects to the seafloor hydro/geophone.

 

 The layout of the VSP survey can be seen at http://brg.ldeo.columbia.edu/data/iodp-eso/exp313/iodp-eso-313-vsp-layout.pdf, http://brg.ldeo.columbia.edu/data/iodp-eso/exp313/M0029A/documents/313-M0029A_vsp-survey-layout1.pdf, and http://brg.ldeo.columbia.edu/data/iodp-eso/exp313/M0029A/documents/313-M0029A_vsp-survey-layout2.pdf . Each VSP shot was recorded and stored digitally.  The signal received by the geophone was digitized in a Geometrics geode and recorded using the Geometrics Seismodule Controller software.  Each VSP shot was recorded on 7 channels (Table 1) to measure the vertical component on the downhole geophone, the vertical and two horizontal components on a seafloor geophone, a seafloor hydrophone (within the housing of the seafloor geophone), a suspended hydrophone, and the electrical signal caused by the movement of the airgun shuttle.  Of the two airguns (20 and 40 cubic inches), only one was fired during each shot.  The record lengths were 2.5 s long covering the time period from -0.5 to 2 seconds.  The sampling rate

 

Data flow was monitored for quality in real time and data quality was recorded on paper to be entered into an Excel spreadsheet post survey, along with shot and receiver coordinates (datum WGS84).  Where available, borehole tilt and azimuth measured by borehole logging is used to calculate horizontal location of the downhole receiver.  Where this information is not available, the borehole is assumed to be vertical.  The Excel quality and coordinate measurements were entered into the VSP data files using MATLAB and VISTA software.  Data was then processed using the Mathworks MATLAB and Seismic Imaging Software VISTA programs.

 

Processing involved removing poor quality shots and stacking the remaining shots at a given depth to improve the signal to noise.  3-D offset information was calculated and entered.  Where possible, first break arrival times were picked for the downhole data, the vertical seafloor geophone, the suspended hydrophone, and the airgun shuttle signal.  Based on a combination of data from the vertical seafloor geophone, suspended hydrophone and airgun shuttle signal, static correction were calculated and applied to account for any time shift caused by the airgun firing past time zero.  The wave form and arrival times of these data were assessed for each survey to determine the best technique of calculating static corrections.

The unstacked raw seismic data were organized into a SEG-Y revision 1 format file that included the necessary shot and receiver positions. A smaller corresponding file that contained the stacked data at each depth is 313-M0029A_vsp-stacked.segy. This file is available online and should be accessible by any program that is able to read the SEG-Y format data.

VSP data was recorded and processed by the University of Alberta who were contracted by EPC.

Additional information about the drilling and logging operations can be found in the Operations section of the Site Chapter in IODP Proceedings of Expedition 313. For further questions about the data, please contact:

 

Jennifer Inwood

University of Leicester

Phone: 011-44-116-252-3327

Fax: 011-44--116-252-3918

E-mail: IODP-UK

 

Johanna Lofi

University of Montpellier 2

Phone: 033- 467-149- 309

Fax: 033- 467- 143- 244

E-mail: IODP-UK

 

For any web site-related problem please contact:

E-mail: Database Manager