IODP-MSP drilling and logging contractor: ESO and Weatherford Wireline Services

Hole: M0065A

Expedition: 347

Location: Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea)

Latitude: 55° 28.094' N

Longitude: 15° 28.631' E

Logging date: October 24, 2013

Sea floor depth (driller's): 87.22 m DRF

Sea floor depth (logger's): 87.22 m WRF

Total penetration: 73.9 m DSF

Total core recovered:  48.48 m (99.19 % of cored section)

Lithologies: Clay, silt and sand

 

 

 

 

 

Data

 

The logging data was recorded by Weatherford Wireline Services under supervision by personnel of RWTH Aachen University, Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy, which is part of the European Petrophysics Consortium (EPC). Data were provided by EPC to Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatoy, which formatted the files for inclusion in the online log database.

 

Logging Runs

 

Tool string

Run/Pass

Top depth

(m WSF)

Bottom depth

(m W SF)

Pipe depth

(m WSF)

Notes

1. MAI/MCG

1

0

43.5

14

 

2. SGS/MCG

2

  no data acquired

 

 

Hole M0065A was drilled with a 8 1/2 inch bit. In preparation for logging, the hole was circulated with sea water and the drill pipe was pulled back to 14 m WSF. Two tool strings were deployed:

MAI/MCG (Array Induction and Gamma Ray), and SGS/MCG (Total and Spectral Gamma Ray); the MAI/MCG acquired data from about 43.5 m to the sea floor. The SGS/MCG tool string reached only 16 m WSF; after a wiper trip, it was lowered again but reached only 20 m WSF, at which point logging was terminated.

 

The data was acquired in high resolution mode with a sampling rate of 0.025 m.

 

 

Processing

 

Depth shift: A depth shift of 87.22 m was applied to all logs; this amount corresponds to the drilling/logging sea floor depth. Slight discrepancies (<1 m) may exist between the seafloor depths seen in the downhole logs (gamma ray) and those determined by the drillers as clay was present on the seabed frame used during this expedition.

 

Environmental corrections: None was applied.

 

 


 

Quality Control

 

The quality of the data is assessed by checking against reasonable values for the logged lithologies and by correspondence between logs affected by the same formation property (e.g. the resistivity log should show similar features to the acoustic log). The quality of the data is good.

 

The total gamma ray values from the different passes correlate well. The potassium concentration is often extrememely low, beyond the tool detection capability. The gamma ray signature is mostly due to the Uranium and Thorium concentrations.

No caliper measurement was carried out in this hole.

 

A null value of -999.25 may replace invalid log values.

 

Additional information about the drilling and logging operations can be found in the Operations section of the Downhole Measurement section in the IODP Proceedings of Expedition 347. For further questions about the data, please contact:

 

Annick Fehr

RWTH Aachen University

Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy

E-mail: IODP-Germany

 

For any web site-related problem please contact:

E-mail: Database Manager