Standard Wireline Data Processing
IODP logging contractor: USIO/LDEO
Hole: U1361A
Expedition: 318
Location: Wilkes Land Margin (antarctic Ocean)
Latitude: 64° 24.5733 ' S
Longitude: 143° 53.2001' E
Logging date: March 1-2, 2010
Sea floor depth (driller's): 3465.5 DRF
Sea floor depth (logger's): 3469.5 m WRF
Total penetration: 3853.5 m DRF 388 (m DSF)
Total core recovered: 338.86 m ( 87.1 % of cored section)
Oldest sediment recovered: Late Miocene
Lithology: Diatomaceous silty claystones and finely-laminated claystones
The logging data
was recorded by Schlumberger in DLIS format. Data were processed at the
Borehole Research Group of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in March 2010.
Tool string |
Pass
|
Top depth (m WMSF) |
Bottom depth (m WMSF) |
Pipe depth (m WMSF) |
Notes |
1. DIT/APS/HLDS/GPIT/HNGS
|
Downlog
|
103 |
Invalid APS/HLDS. Caliper closed. |
||
Uplog
|
101.5 |
Reference |
|||
2. FMS/DSI/GPIT/HNGS
|
Pass 1
|
Open hole |
|||
Pass 2
|
101 |
The hole was drilled to a total depth of 3465.5 m DRF. After re-entering the hole a short wiper trip was made and the hole was displaced with 10.2 lb/gal sepiolite/barite mud in preparation for logging. The DIT/APS/HLDS/GPIT/HNGS tool string was run first, followed by the FMS/DSI/GPIT/HNGS. Some difficulties were encountered while re-entering the drill pipe on the last FMS pass. The sea state was high with a peak-to-peak heave of 1-3 m and the wireline heave compensator was used.
The depths in
the table are for the processed logs (after depth shift to the sea floor and depth matching between passes). Generally, discrepancies may exist between the
sea floor depths determined from the downhole logs and those determined by the
drillers from the pipe length. Typical reasons for depth discrepancies are ship
heave, wireline and pipe stretch, tides, and the difficulty of getting an
accurate sea floor from a 'bottom felt' depth in soft sediment.
Depth shift to sea floor and depth match. The original logs were first shifted to the sea floor (- 3469.5 m). The sea floor depth was determined by the step in gamma ray values at 3469.5 WRF. This differs by 4 m from the sea floor depth given by the drillers (see above). The depth-shifted logs have then been depth-matched to the gamma ray log from the uplog of the DIT/APS/HLDS/GPIT/HNGS tool string (reference run).
Depth matching
is typically done in the following way. One log is chosen as reference (base)
log (usually the total gamma ray log from the run with the greatest vertical
extent and no sudden changes in cable speed), and then the features in the
equivalent logs from the other runs are matched to it in turn. This matching is
performed manually. The depth adjustments that were required to bring the match
log in line with the base log are then applied to all the other logs from the
same tool string.
Environmental
corrections. The HNGS
data were corrected for hole size during the recording. The APS and
HLDS data were corrected for standoff and hole size respectively during the
recording.
High-resolution data. Bulk density (HLDS) and neutron porosity (APS) data were recorded sampling rates of 2.54 and 5.08 cm, respectively, in addition to the standard sampling rate of 15.24 cm. The enhanced bulk density curve is the result of Schlumberger enhanced processing technique performed on the MAXIS system onboard. While in normal processing short-spacing data is smoothed to match the long-spacing one, in enhanced processing this is reversed. In a situation where there is good contact between the HLDS pad and the borehole wall (low-density correction) the results are improved, because the short spacing has better vertical resolution.
Acoustic data. The dipole shear sonic imager (DSI) was operated in P&S monopole and upper dipole modes using standard frequencies. The compressional data (DTCO) were originally good only below 150-160 m WMSF; they were reprocessed onboard to obtain valid data through the entire interval. The dipole shear data (DT2) were good below 345 m WMSF, but poor above this depth as slowness decreased below the capability of the acquisition software (<775 us/ft). Reprocessing of the shear data is to be performed at a later date.
Quality
Control
The quality of
the data is assessed by checking against reasonable values for the logged
lithologies, by repeatability between different passes of the same tool, and by
correspondence between logs affected by the same formation property (e.g. the
resistivity log should show similar features to the sonic velocity log).
Gamma ray logs
recorded through bottom hole assembly (BHA) and drill pipe should be used only
qualitatively, because of the attenuation of the incoming signal. The
thick-walled BHA attenuates the signal more than the thinner-walled drill pipe.
A wide (>12") and/or irregular borehole affects most recordings, particularly those that require eccentralization and a good contact with the borehole wall (APS, HLDS). Porosity logs showed average values of 60-70% , with many excursions to 100% as a result of the increased hole size and larger standoff. Density values ranged mostly around 1.6 - 1.8 g/cc with PEFL 2.5-4.0. Hole diameter was recorded by the hydraulic caliper on the HLDS tool (LCAL) and by the FMS tool (C1 and C2). The hole quality appeared to be fairly good as the caliper read mostly from 12-14" near bottom to around 205 m WMSF. Above this depth level up to to the drill pipe at 101 m WMSF, the hole size increased to 14-17" with some excursions to 18".
The spherically focused resistivity (SFLU) displayed an offset of about - 0.2 ohm with respect to the IMPH and IDPH logs.
A null value of
-999.25 may replace invalid log values.
Additional
information about the drilling and logging operations can be found in the
Operations and Downhole Measurements sections of the expedition reports,
Proceedings of the Integrated Drilling Program, Expedition 318.
For further questions about the logs, please contact:
Tanzhuo Liu
Phone: 845-365-8630
Fax: 845-365-3182
E-mail: Tanzhuo Liu
Cristina Broglia
Phone: 845-365-8343
Fax: 845-365-3182
E-mail: Cristina Broglia