Standard Wireline Data Processing

 

IODP logging contractor: USIO/LDEO

Hole: U1414A

Expedition: 344

Location: Costa Rica Pacific Margin (Equatorial NE Pacific Ocean)

Latitude: 8° 30.2304' N

Longitude: 84° 13.5298' W

Sea floor depth (driller's): 2469.1 m DRF

Sea floor depth (logger's): 2469 m WRF

Total penetration:  2940.7 m DRF (471.6 m DSF)

Total core recovered: 383.95 m ( 81 % of cored section)

Oldest sediment recovered: Miocene (~15 My)

Lithologies:  Silty clay and sand, calcareous and siliceous ooze, calcareous and siliceous cemented siltstone and sandstone, basalt

 

Data

 

The logging data was recorded by Schlumberger in DLIS format. Data were processed at the Borehole Research Group of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in December 2012.

 

 

Logging Runs

Tool string
Run/Pass
Top depth (m WMSF) Bottom depth (m WMSF) Pipe depth (m WMSF)
Notes
1. HRLA/UBI/GPIT/HLDS/EDTC-B/HNGS
Downlog
0
420
95
HLDS Caliper closed
Pass 1
140
415
open hole
Pass 2
311
418
open hole
Pass 3
0
329
95
2. FMS/DSI/GPIT/EDTC-B/HNGS
Downlog
0
405
95
Calipers closed
Pass 1
301
415
open hole
Pass 2
0
413
95
Reference

 

 

Hole U1414A was drilled to a depth of 2940.7 m DRF (471.6 m DSF). Since the hole had been cored and re-entered without problems, no wiper trip was carried out before starting the logging operations. Ten barrels of heavy mud were pumped at the bottom of the hole to stop backflow.

 

The HRLA/UBI/HLDS/EDTC-B//GPIT/HNGS tool string was run first; a downlog and three uplogs were recorded. No data could be collected below 2886 m WRF (417 m WSF), due to an impassable obstruction. The wireline heave compensator (WHC) was not used, due to malfunction. The sea state, however, was calm, with peak-to-peak heaves of less than 1 m.

 

The FMS/DSI/GPIT/EDTC-B/HNGS tool string was run next; one downlog and two uplog passes were recorded. The WHC was used, achieving a compensation efficiency of more than 90%, with very low peak-to-peak heave less than 0.5 m. Logs were acquired from the impassable bridge at 2886 m WRF (417 m WSF) up.

 

The depths in the table are for the processed logs (after depth shift to the sea floor and depth matching between passes). Generally, discrepancies may exist between the sea floor depths determined from the downhole logs and those determined by the drillers from the pipe length. Typical reasons for depth discrepancies are ship heave, wireline and pipe stretch, tides, and the difficulty of getting an accurate sea floor from a 'bottom felt' depth in soft sediment.

 

 

Processing

 

Depth shift to sea floor and depth match. The original logs were first shifted to the sea floor (- 2469 m). The sea floor depth was determined by the step in gamma ray values at 2469 m WRF on the HRLA/UBI/HLDS/EDTC-B//GPIT/HNGS. This differs by 0.1 m from the sea floor depth given by the drillers (see above). The depth-shifted logs have then been depth-matched to the gamma ray log from the second pass of the FMS/DSI/GPIT/EDTC-B/HNGS tool string.

 

Depth matching is typically done in the following way. One log is chosen as reference (base) log (usually the total gamma ray log from the run with the greatest vertical extent and no sudden changes in cable speed), and then the features in the equivalent logs from the other runs are matched to it in turn. This matching is performed manually. The depth adjustments that were required to bring the match log in line with the base log are then applied to all the other logs from the same tool string.

 

Environmental corrections. The HNGS and HRLA data were corrected for hole size during the recording.

 

High-resolution data. Gamma Ray data from the EDTC-B tool were recorded at sampling rates of 5.08 and 15.24 cm. 

 

Acoustic data. The dipole shear sonic imager (DSI) was operated in P&S monopole and upper and lower dipole on each pass. The original velocity profiles from the three passes are not fully repeatable; the velocities from pass 2, obtained from the processing of the sonic waveforms performed on shore, are of very good quality.

 

Quality Control

 

The quality of the data is assessed by checking against reasonable values for the logged lithologies, by repeatability between different passes of the same tool, and by correspondence between logs affected by the same formation property (e.g. the resistivity log should show similar features to the sonic velocity log).

 

Gamma ray logs recorded through bottom hole assembly (BHA) and drill pipe should be used only qualitatively, because of the attenuation of the incoming signal. The thick-walled BHA attenuates the signal more than the thinner-walled drill pipe.

 

Hole diameter was recorded by the hydraulic caliper on the HLDS tool (LCAL) and by the FMS tool (C1 and C2). The hole is very enlarged and of elliptical shape. Only below 340 m WMSF the FMS caliper readings are less than 11 inches and show a hole of circular shape (basalt interval).

A null value of -999.25 may replace invalid log values.

 

Additional information about the drilling and logging operations can be found in the Operations and Downhole Measurements sections of the expedition reports, Proceedings of the Integrated Drilling Program, Expedition 344. For further questions about the logs, please contact:

 

 

Tanzhuo Liu

Phone: 845-365-8630

Fax: 845-365-3182

E-mail: Tanzhuo Liu

 

Cristina Broglia

Phone: 845-365-8343

Fax: 845-365-3182

E-mail: Cristina Broglia