Wireline Standard Data Processing

 

ODP logging contractor: LDEO-BRG

Well name: 642D

Leg: 104

Location: Voring Plateau (Norwegian Sea)

Latitude: 67° 13.2' N

Longitude: 2° 55.8' E

Logging date: July, 1985

Bottom felt: 1292.1 mbrf (used for depth shift to sea floor)

Total penetration: 199.6 mbsf

Total core recovered: 192.8 m (96.6 %)

 

Logging Runs

 

Logging string 1: DIT/LSS/GR (3 sections)

Logging string 2: LDT/CNTG/NGT

      No information available about use of wireline heave compensator. Ship heave was less than 0.3 m.

Bottom-hole Assembly

 

      The following bottom-hole assembly depths are as they appear on the logs after differential depth shift (see "Depth shift" section) and depth shift to the sea floor. As such, there might be a discrepancy with the original depths given by the drillers onboard. Possible reasons for depth discrepancies are ship heave, lack of wireline heave compensator, and drill string and/or wireline stretch.

      DIT/LSS/GR: Bottom-hole assembly at ~32.5 mbsf

      LDT/CNTG/NGT: Bottom-hole assembly at ~32.5 mbsf.

 

Processing

 

      Depth shift: Original logs have been interactively depth shifted with reference to NGT from LDT/CNTG/NGT run and to the sea floor (- 1292.1 m). The program used is an interactive, graphical depth-match program which allows to visually correlate logs and to define appropriate shifts. The reference and match channels are displayed on the screen, with vectors connecting old (reference curve) and new (match curve) shift depths. The total gamma ray curve (SGR) from the NGT tool run on each logging string is used to correlate the logging runs most often. In general, the reference curve is chosen on the basis of constant, low cable tension and high cable speed (tools run at faster speeds are less likely to stick and are less susceptible to data degradation caused by ship heave). Other factors, however, such as the length of the logged interval, the presence of drill pipe, and the statistical quality of the collected data (better statistics is obtained at lower logging speeds) are also considered in the selection. A list of the amount of differential depth shifts applied at this hole is  available upon request.

 

      Gamma-ray processing: NGT data have been processed to correct for borehole size and type of drilling fluid.

 

      Acoustic data processing: Because of the extremely noisy character of the sonic logs, no standard processing could be performed. As the TT4 (10-ft transmitter-receiver spacing) transit time was the only transit time not affected by noise or cycle skipping, an un-compensated compressional velocity has been calculated from it.

 

Quality Control

 

      null value=-999.25. This value generally appears in discrete core measurement files and also it may replace recorded log values or results which are considered invalid (ex. processed sonic data).

      During the processing, quality control of the data is mainly performed by cross-correlation of all logging data. Large (>12") and/or irregular borehole affects most recordings, particularly those that require eccentralization (CNTG, LDT) and a good contact with the borehole wall.

      Data recorded through bottom-hole assembly, such as GR and NGT above 32.5 mbsf, should be used qualitatively only because of the attenuation on the incoming signal.

      Hole diameter was recorded by the 3-arm mechanical caliper. The caliper, however, did not measure the hole size correctly because of chips of rock trapped in the caliper arms.

 

      Additional information about the logs can be found in the "Explanatory Notes" and Site Chapter, ODP IR volume 104. For further questions about the logs, please contact:

 

Cristina Broglia
Phone: 845-365-8343
Fax: 845-365-3182
E-mail: Cristina Broglia