Wireline Standard Data Processing

 

ODP logging contractor: LDEO-BRG

Well name: 719B

Leg: 116

Location: Bengal Fan (central tropical S Indian Ocean)

Latitude: 0° 57.646' S

Longitude: 81° 23.967' E

Logging date: August, 1987

Bottom felt: 4748.2 mbrf (used for depth shift to sea floor)

Total penetration: 465.6 mbsf

Total core recovered: none

 

Logging Runs

 

Logging string 1: DIT/SDT/NGT

Logging string 2: ACT/GST/NGT

Logging string 3: LDT/CNTG/NGT

      No information available about use of wireline heave compensator.

 

 

Bottom-hole Assembly

 

      The following bottom-hole assembly depths are as they appear on the logs after differential depth shift (see "Depth shift" section) and depth shift to the sea floor. As such, there might be a discrepancy with the original depths given by the drillers onboard. Possible reasons for depth discrepancies are ship heave, use of wireline heave compensator, and drill string and/or wireline stretch.

      DIT/SDT/NGT: bottom hole assembly at ~ 87.5 mbsf.

      ACT/GST/NGT: bottom hole assembly at ~ 87.5 mbsf.

      LDT/CNTG/NGT: bottom hole assembly at ~ 87.5 @ mbsf.

 

Processing

 

      Depth shift: Original logs have been interactively depth shifted with reference to NGT from LDT/CNTG/NGT run and to the sea floor (- 4744.2 m). The amount of the depth shift corresponds to the water depth as observed on the logs: it differs 4 m from the "bottom felt" depth given by the drillers (see header). The program used is an interactive, graphical depth-match program, which allows to visually correlate logs and to define appropriate shifts. The reference and match channels are displayed on the screen, with vectors connecting old (reference curve) and new (match curve) shift depths. The total gamma ray curve (SGR) from the NGT tool run on each logging string is used to correlate the logging runs most often. In general, the reference curve is chosen on the basis of constant, low cable tension and high cable speed (tools run at faster speeds are less likely to stick and are less susceptible to data degradation caused by ship heave). Other factors, however, such as the length of the logged interval, the presence of drill pipe, and the statistical quality of the collected data (better statistics is obtained at lower logging speeds) are also considered in the selection. A list of the amount of differential depth shifts applied at this hole is available upon request.

 

      Gamma-ray processing: Data have been processed to correct for borehole size and type of drilling fluid.

 

      Acoustic data processing: The array sonic tool was operated in standard depth-derived borehole compensated mode, including long-spacing (8-10-10-12') logs. The sonic logs have been processed to eliminate some of the noise and cycle skipping experienced during the recording. Using two sets of the four transit time measurements and proper depth justification, four independent measurements over a -2ft interval centered on the depth of interest are determined, each based on the difference between a pair of transmitters and receivers. The program discards any transit time that is negative or falls outside a range of meaningful values selected by the processor.

 

      Geochemical data: Due to the low quality of the results, no processed geochemical data from this hole has been included in the online database.

 

Quality Control

 

      null value=-999.25. This value generally appears in discrete core measurement files and also it may replace invalid log values or results (ex. processed sonic data).

      During the processing, quality control of the data is mainly performed by cross-correlation of all logging data. Large (>12") and/or irregular borehole affects most recordings, particularly those that require eccentralization (CNTG, HLDT) and a good contact with the borehole wall.

      Data recorded through bottom hole assembly, such as the neutron and gamma ray data above 87.5 mbsf, should be used qualitatively only because of the attenuation on the incoming signal.

      No valid caliper measurements were performed.

      The resistivity data from the upper and lower interval were spliced at 252.4 mbsf; the acoustic data were spliced at 247.8 mbsf.

 

      Additional information about the logs can be found in the "Explanatory Notes" and Site Chapter, ODP IR volume 116. For further questions about the logs, please contact:

 

Cristina Broglia

Phone: 845-365-8343

Fax: 845-365-3182

E-mail: Cristina Broglia